Discussion:
VAF Freq Response question
(too old to reply)
Belial
2004-10-10 10:28:16 UTC
Permalink
I just noticed that in the DC-X gen 4 PDF an 'unsmoothed' freq response
graph is shown (labelled as 30-25khz, although the graph itself looks to
only show 40-10khz...).

Other freq response graphs on the VAF site are 'sm 1/3 Oct'.

Firstly, what's the smoothing process, any why would you do it (apart
from the obvious marketing reasons)? What exactly does sm 1/3 oct mean?

Secondly - has the new DC-X set a standard? Can we expect unsmoothed VAF
graphs in the future?

I'm not trying to be a PITA here - I'm genuinely interested in comparing
the VAF range (probably the DC-7 gen4s) with various other speakers, and
looking at freq response is a nice way to start shortlisting, before I
start the long and painful auditioning phase.

Ben
Adam F
2004-10-10 10:51:47 UTC
Permalink
AFAIK VAF has always published the response curves w/o smoothing, seem to
remember the website making a big deal of it way back when.


//Adam F
Post by Belial
I just noticed that in the DC-X gen 4 PDF an 'unsmoothed' freq response
graph is shown (labelled as 30-25khz, although the graph itself looks to
only show 40-10khz...).
Other freq response graphs on the VAF site are 'sm 1/3 Oct'.
Firstly, what's the smoothing process, any why would you do it (apart from
the obvious marketing reasons)? What exactly does sm 1/3 oct mean?
Secondly - has the new DC-X set a standard? Can we expect unsmoothed VAF
graphs in the future?
I'm not trying to be a PITA here - I'm genuinely interested in comparing
the VAF range (probably the DC-7 gen4s) with various other speakers, and
looking at freq response is a nice way to start shortlisting, before I
start the long and painful auditioning phase.
Ben
Phil Allison
2004-10-10 11:13:45 UTC
Permalink
"Belial"
Post by Belial
I just noticed that in the DC-X gen 4 PDF an 'unsmoothed' freq response
graph is shown (labelled as 30-25khz, although the graph itself looks to
only show 40-10khz...).
** The scale on the bottom of that graph goes to 20 kHz - 10 kHz
corresponds with the third zero in " 10000.0 "
Post by Belial
Other freq response graphs on the VAF site are 'sm 1/3 Oct'.
Firstly, what's the smoothing process, any why would you do it (apart from
the obvious marketing reasons)? What exactly does sm 1/3 oct mean?
** The smoothing process removes all fine detail from a speaker's response
graph - it tends to make poor or even atrocious speakers look a great deal
better. " sm 1/3 oct " refers to smoothing based on a set of filters
spaced apart by a factor of 1.26 - so with centres at 100Hz, 126 Hz,
159 Hz, 200 Hz .....

The VAF DC- X graph has been produced by an undisclosed process with an
undisclosed mic position (or many positions summed) and in a manner
carefully determined to produce a nice straight line.
Post by Belial
Secondly - has the new DC-X set a standard? Can we expect unsmoothed VAF
graphs in the future?
** Just like you can soon expect KFC to produce totally fat free chicken.
Post by Belial
I'm not trying to be a PITA here - I'm genuinely interested in comparing
the VAF range (probably the DC-7 gen4s) with various other speakers, and
looking at freq response is a nice way to start shortlisting, before I
start the long and painful auditioning phase.
** Phil Vaf will just love you - since that is just wants he wants you to
do. If you can tell which wiggly line is straighter than another you are
have passed the Vaf IQ test and are automatically entered into the Vaf
marketing game - be prepared for a roller coaster ride.



............. Phil
Belial
2004-10-10 11:45:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phil Allison
** The scale on the bottom of that graph goes to 20 kHz - 10 kHz
corresponds with the third zero in " 10000.0 "
Ahh, thanks.
Post by Phil Allison
** The smoothing process removes all fine detail from a speaker's response
graph - it tends to make poor or even atrocious speakers look a great deal
better. " sm 1/3 oct " refers to smoothing based on a set of filters
spaced apart by a factor of 1.26 - so with centres at 100Hz, 126 Hz,
159 Hz, 200 Hz .....
So basically it's just a marketing ploy? Fantastic.
Post by Phil Allison
** Phil Vaf will just love you - since that is just wants he wants you to
do. If you can tell which wiggly line is straighter than another you are
have passed the Vaf IQ test and are automatically entered into the Vaf
marketing game - be prepared for a roller coaster ride.
Hehe, point taken. Of course I wouldn't be relying *solely* on nice
straight lines, but, ya know, they sure are purdy ;)

Ben
Patrick Turner
2004-10-13 17:01:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Belial
Post by Phil Allison
** The scale on the bottom of that graph goes to 20 kHz - 10 kHz
corresponds with the third zero in " 10000.0 "
Ahh, thanks.
Post by Phil Allison
** The smoothing process removes all fine detail from a speaker's response
graph - it tends to make poor or even atrocious speakers look a great deal
better. " sm 1/3 oct " refers to smoothing based on a set of filters
spaced apart by a factor of 1.26 - so with centres at 100Hz, 126 Hz,
159 Hz, 200 Hz .....
So basically it's just a marketing ploy? Fantastic.
Post by Phil Allison
** Phil Vaf will just love you - since that is just wants he wants you to
do. If you can tell which wiggly line is straighter than another you are
have passed the Vaf IQ test and are automatically entered into the Vaf
marketing game - be prepared for a roller coaster ride.
Hehe, point taken. Of course I wouldn't be relying *solely* on nice
straight lines, but, ya know, they sure are purdy ;)
Ben
Sorry to all about posting this so late after the discussion has proceded so far,
but I had bothers with my ISP.......

First, let me make it clear to all I don't consider myself
the perfect expert on speakers, but from what I see here on the news group,
there ain't many about, and most self proclaimed experts ain't perfect.

When I test speakers to see what's the matter with them during a repair job,
or if I have to build a new set from scratch, I don't have all the facilities that

VAF claim to have, but I really doubt I need them.

I use pink noise as the test signal, and I have fairly flat mic, +/-1 dB along the
band,
and I have a tuneable filter which has a variable frequency setting and a Q =
about 12, so that if I set the filter at 1 kHz, the bandwidth of noise I sample is
about 83 Hz,
and I can run along the band and follow the peaks and troughs in the response
which have a Q of less than 12.
The peaks and troughs with a greater Q than 12 tend to be smoothed out.
But at least I seem to be able to get excellent sounding speakers this way,
but one thing I have never seen on any speakers I have ever tested is a nice flat
line like VAF gets.
The peaks or nulls in the response with a Q of greater than 12, or even a lot less

may not easily be engineered out by a speaker maker. He is really rather dependant

on what SEAS or Scanspeak or Audax have done a long way away in their factory.

Many speakers other than what I have made using SEAS drivers will
test with +/- 6 dB rise and fall, even with the
mic only a meter away on axis.
And if I try say 5 different positions for the mic, I can get a different graph
for each position.

When I did use 5 different positions with my own speakers, and I summed the
graphs, by adding the dB level of each mic position, and then dividing by 5 for an

average, there were still lumps and dips and peaks along the band, but ones I
didn't think
were worth trying to remove, since the crossovers become hellishly complex if
one tries to compensate for speaker all the speaker analomies.
In my own speakers, I have used some very decent SEAS drivers, and very
well crafted heavy and inert enclosures, my speakers are most certainly far better

than anything I see around using glorified basic cheap kitchen joinery
materials with speakers thrown in.

So I don't take much notice of VAF speaker curves.

The DC-X also have a fairly flat impedance curve.

There appears to be two bass drivers each with a different volume enclosure,
and its all touted as being very gee whiz by VAF, and it is, until you realize
that its an application of an idea mentioned in the Radiotron Designer's Handbook,

4th Ed, 1955, and if you go to page 848, the Z graph of a pair of bass drivers
with different Fb
is clearly shown, and it explains the bottom end Z graph of VAF.
I guess the nice flat Z graph is achieved with a 50c MDF dividing panel inside the

box.
Whether it sounds better is a moot point, but my ears tell me
that VAF DC-X don't have the best bass production that is possible,
and that the top end is a little bright.
I have a client here with DC-X and I would like to have measured my client's VAF
speakers by standing them alongside
my own and micing at different positions. There is probably room for
improvement in the crossovers, which in the DC-X model my client owns consists of
one sole
capacitor drive to the tweeter, since there is reliance on the natural roll
off of the bass units to complement the roll on of the tweeter.
Many speakers used to be configured this way, which is a bean counter's delight,
because there was no expense on any inductors in a crossover.
But it only works well if the bass drivers have a smooth roll off with none of the
usual
cone breakup peaks and troughs very commonly seen in poor quality drivers
which used to be standard fare in "Budget Special" speakers made 30 years ago.

VAF DC-X are fair value for the $$, despite the BS that the maker imposes on us
and expects us to believe.
The DC-X are easy to drive, and give fair sound quality imho, but my
client here is upgrading to I-66 soon, and we wonder what our ears will tell us.

The bottom line is, what else can you buy that is as good or better than the VAF
price being
asked?


Patrick Turner.
Philip Vafiadis
2004-10-11 01:56:54 UTC
Permalink
"Phil Allison" <***@tpg.com.au> wrote in message news:***@uni-berlin.de...
<SNIP<
Post by Phil Allison
The VAF DC- X graph has been produced by an undisclosed process with an
undisclosed mic position (or many positions summed) and in a manner
carefully determined to produce a nice straight line.
............. Phil
Apologies, and your resulting scepticism is noted.

Fig 1 and 1a in the G4 DC-X pdf file were measured at precisely 3.0 meters
from the central axis between the tweeters and directly forward of the
speaker. 3m is chosen as statistics show that in the majority of homes,
owners position speakers between 2 and 4 meters of the listening location.

We used B&K 4135 mic with B&K 2633 preamp with B&K 2804 battery powered
power supply. All proprietary B&K cables & connectors were also used. The
mic and preamp were calibrated less than 6 months ago against VIPAC
Engineering's reference. The data was acquired using the current version of
MLSSA. Just as MLSSA labels clearly indicated, no averaging or smoothing was
applied.

Kind regards
Philip Vafiadis
Founder, VAF Research Pty Ltd
www.vaf.com.au
Adam F
2004-10-11 09:31:26 UTC
Permalink
...and PV regains the lead as they round the turn...



//adam f
Post by Philip Vafiadis
<SNIP<
Post by Phil Allison
The VAF DC- X graph has been produced by an undisclosed process with an
undisclosed mic position (or many positions summed) and in a manner
carefully determined to produce a nice straight line.
............. Phil
Apologies, and your resulting scepticism is noted.
Fig 1 and 1a in the G4 DC-X pdf file were measured at precisely 3.0 meters
from the central axis between the tweeters and directly forward of the
speaker. 3m is chosen as statistics show that in the majority of homes,
owners position speakers between 2 and 4 meters of the listening location.
We used B&K 4135 mic with B&K 2633 preamp with B&K 2804 battery powered
power supply. All proprietary B&K cables & connectors were also used. The
mic and preamp were calibrated less than 6 months ago against VIPAC
Engineering's reference. The data was acquired using the current version
of MLSSA. Just as MLSSA labels clearly indicated, no averaging or
smoothing was applied.
Kind regards
Philip Vafiadis
Founder, VAF Research Pty Ltd
www.vaf.com.au
Robby
2004-10-11 09:50:54 UTC
Permalink
Allison loses again!
Phil Allison
2004-10-11 09:55:10 UTC
Permalink
"Robby"
Post by Robby
Allison loses again!
** The human fence post and Vaf stooge post has just farted.




.......... Phil
paul packer
2004-10-11 10:45:45 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 19:55:10 +1000, "Phil Allison"
Post by Phil Allison
"Robby"
Post by Robby
Allison loses again!
** The human fence post and Vaf stooge post has just farted.
Flatulance appears to be on your mind this month, Phil. Having
problems at that end, are we?
Phil Allison
2004-10-11 11:04:32 UTC
Permalink
"paul packer"
"Phil Allison"
Post by paul packer
Post by Phil Allison
"Robby"
Post by Robby
Allison loses again!
** The human fence post and Vaf stooge has just farted.
Flatulance appears to be on your mind this month, Phil.
** So you are a "fart smeller" plus a bad speller too.
Post by paul packer
Having problems at that end, are we?
** Bet a blimp full of gas like you has never farted in his whole life.

Must be ready to float away at any moment.

Remember what happened to the Hindenburg.

One bright spark and *you* are done for.




............. Phil
TT
2004-10-11 11:27:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phil Allison
"paul packer"
"Phil Allison"
** So you are a "fart smeller" plus a bad speller too.
............. Phil
Dyslexia to? That's *smart fella* or are you into "Spoonerisms" as well?

SS
paul packer
2004-10-11 11:48:33 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 21:04:32 +1000, "Phil Allison"
Post by Phil Allison
"paul packer"
"Phil Allison"
Post by paul packer
Post by Phil Allison
"Robby"
Post by Robby
Allison loses again!
** The human fence post and Vaf stooge has just farted.
Flatulance appears to be on your mind this month, Phil.
** So you are a "fart smeller" plus a bad speller too.
Post by paul packer
Having problems at that end, are we?
** Bet a blimp full of gas like you has never farted in his whole life.
(etc...etc...childish ramble). The difference between us, Phil--one of
many--is that I don't discuss things like that. If you wish to,
perhaps you should start a new NG---rec.farted.opinion, something like
that. Something that might get you away from the rest of us.
Phil Allison
2004-10-11 12:05:58 UTC
Permalink
"paul packer"
"Phil Allison"
Post by paul packer
Post by Phil Allison
Post by paul packer
Flatulance appears to be on your mind this month, Phil.
** So you are a "fart smeller" plus a bad speller too.
Post by paul packer
Having problems at that end, are we?
** Bet a blimp full of gas like you has never farted in his whole life.
Must be ready to float away at any moment.
Remember what happened to the Hindenburg.
One bright spark and *you* are done for.
(etc...etc...childish ramble). The difference between us, Phil--one of
many--is that I don't discuss things like that.
** Errrrr - you just did.
Post by paul packer
If you wish to, perhaps you should start a new NG---rec.farted.opinion,
** You looking for somewhere new to post are you Packer ????

One called "rec.farted.opinion" sounds tailor made for a big bag of methane
gas like you.

Get you away from all those naughty little whipping boys for a while.




............. Phil
paul packer
2004-10-11 12:18:35 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 22:05:58 +1000, "Phil Allison"
Post by Phil Allison
** You looking for somewhere new to post are you Packer ????
One called "rec.farted.opinion" sounds tailor made for a big bag of methane
gas like you.
Get you away from all those naughty little whipping boys for a while.
I'm afraid there's only one suitable punishment for you, Phil. The
most severe, the most terrible punishment a person like you would ever
have to suffer.

We're just going to have to ignore you.
Philip Vafiadis
2004-10-11 01:34:58 UTC
Permalink
Hi Ben, please see comments in line below...
Post by Belial
I just noticed that in the DC-X gen 4 PDF an 'unsmoothed' freq response
graph is shown (labelled as 30-25khz, although the graph itself looks to
only show 40-10khz...).
No, those are just the lowest and highest labels. Look carefully at the
position of the lines.
Post by Belial
Other freq response graphs on the VAF site are 'sm 1/3 Oct'.
Yes, in the past we have published 1/3 octave plots as that is the industry
norm. In this way comparisons can be made with published data from other
manufacturers. Given that VAF value accuracy we have taken the
(unprecedented?) approach of now publishing both smoothed and unsmoothed
responses to show an exact representation of what the speaker is reproducing
as well as allowing comparisons with other brands.
Post by Belial
Firstly, what's the smoothing process, any why would you do it (apart from
the obvious marketing reasons)? What exactly does sm 1/3 oct mean?
Other than for the above marketing reasons it can make seeing response
trends easier. Even full octave smoothing is regularly used during the
design process but rarely published.
Post by Belial
Secondly - has the new DC-X set a standard? Can we expect unsmoothed VAF
graphs in the future?
A standard implies industry agreement. We possibly have set a Benchmark
though. I am not aware of other companies publishing unsmoothed data but
would like to know of others doing so. While VAF is the only Australian
manufacturer that is a member of ALMA (the international loudspeaker
manufacturers association), no Australian Industry Association exists. The
Australian Standards for such things are 'lowest common denominator' with
little relavence to High Fidelity sound reproduction. Perhaps it may be
possible to drive new measurement standards if other companies who value
such things are prepared to colaborate?

With regard to seeing more unsmoothed responses from VAF....definitely yes.
We listened to the controversy last year and despite already publishing more
data than almost any other company and that we have identified almost no
other manufacturer publishing unsmoothed data, VAF will do so.
Post by Belial
I'm not trying to be a PITA here - I'm genuinely interested in comparing
the VAF range (probably the DC-7 gen4s) with various other speakers, and
looking at freq response is a nice way to start shortlisting, before I
start the long and painful auditioning phase.> > Ben
Ben, which other manufacturers have you found who publish this data, either
smoothed or unsmoothed? The Step response is another telling response. It is
also reletavely easy to make these days and you will see this published for
more and more VAF speakers as we update our marketing material. We will
continue to publish Phase reponse and Cumulative spectral decay as well.

Kind regards
Philip Vafiadis
Founder, VAF Research Pty Ltd
www.vaf.com.au
Belial
2004-10-11 09:06:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Philip Vafiadis
Ben, which other manufacturers have you found who publish this data, either
smoothed or unsmoothed? The Step response is another telling response. It is
also reletavely easy to make these days and you will see this published for
more and more VAF speakers as we update our marketing material. We will
continue to publish Phase reponse and Cumulative spectral decay as well.
Thanks for the excellent reponse Phil. I must admit that after the
'controversy' last year I was a little put off. Your lack of (perceived)
concern seemed to indicate you weren't that worried about defending your
gear - it's great to see that you stand by your products, as I'd
previously thought.

You're right about the publishing by other manufacturers - I've found it
pretty frustrating. theloudspeakerkit.com publish full range freq
response graphs, but they don't mention if it's smoothed. Usually
though, it's just the standard Xhz - Xkhz +/-3db.

As a slight aside, any news on when the next gen DC-7s will be
available? I've heard a couple of very positive comments from people who
have heard the 'work in progress', and the current model is the size I'm
looking for and (just) within my price range. I'll be down your way
visiting family some time this year and would love to drop by and check
them out.

Ben
Phil Allison
2004-10-11 09:25:56 UTC
Permalink
"Belial"
Post by Belial
Post by Philip Vafiadis
Ben, which other manufacturers have you found who publish this data,
either smoothed or unsmoothed? The Step response is another telling
response. It is also reletavely easy to make these days and you will see
this published for more and more VAF speakers as we update our marketing
material. We will continue to publish Phase response and Cumulative
spectral decay as well.
Thanks for the excellent reponse Phil.
** Sucked in.

The response graph is smoothed - by whatever means.

The phase graph is meaningless done that way.

The CSD graph is not a good result.




............. Phil
Belial
2004-10-11 09:56:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phil Allison
"Belial"
Post by Belial
Thanks for the excellent reponse Phil.
** Sucked in.
Possibly ;) I was (once again) impressed by PVs politeness and general
eagerness to help. Yes, he's trying to sell stuff, but there's a lot of
other folk trying to sell 'HiFi' that are much less helpful....

If anyone else has any other suggetions on sub-$1k 'full range' speakers
that sound decent I'm very much interested. The DC-7s and the LSK's F6s
are all that I've found so far.

Ben
Phil Allison
2004-10-11 10:21:49 UTC
Permalink
"Belial"
Post by Belial
Post by Phil Allison
"Belial"
Post by Belial
Thanks for the excellent reponse Phil.
** Sucked in.
Possibly ;) I was (once again) impressed by PVs politeness and general
eagerness to help.
** Yep - PV is always ready to help himself.
Post by Belial
Yes, he's trying to sell stuff, but there's a lot of other folk trying to
sell 'HiFi' that are much less helpful....
** Damn funny idea of "helpful" you have there.
Post by Belial
If anyone else has any other suggetions on sub-$1k 'full range' speakers
that sound decent I'm very much interested.
** Check out the Jaycar JC80





............. Phil
Belial
2004-10-11 10:58:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phil Allison
** Check out the Jaycar JC80
I've heard them in store and they didn't do a lot for me. Admittedly it
was far from a perfect, or even nice, listening environment. Might check
em out again - the price is definately right.

Ben
Adam F
2004-10-12 07:23:30 UTC
Permalink
JC80s are superior to the old JV60s imho, I didn't like their metal tweeter.
Bass has always been good though.


//Adam F
Post by Belial
Post by Phil Allison
** Check out the Jaycar JC80
I've heard them in store and they didn't do a lot for me. Admittedly it
was far from a perfect, or even nice, listening environment. Might check
em out again - the price is definately right.
Ben
Adam F
2004-10-13 05:27:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phil Allison
** Check out the Jaycar JC80
Actually I'm surprised you like them PA, wasn't one of your criticisms of
the DC-Xes that they use 8" drivers crossed over too high? Are the JC80s
better because one woofer is rolled off under ~200Hz?


//Adam F
TT
2004-10-13 05:37:59 UTC
Permalink
"Adam F" <***@uts.edu.au> wrote in message news:g13bd.23944$***@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
:
: "Adam F" <***@uts.edu.au> wrote in message
: news:SDLad.23058$***@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
: > "Belial" <***@privacy.net> wrote in message
: > news:ckdp0v$2261$***@otis.netspace.net.au...
: >> Phil Allison wrote:
: >>
: >>>
: >>> ** Check out the Jaycar JC80
: >>
:
:
: Actually I'm surprised you like them PA, wasn't one of
your criticisms of
: the DC-Xes that they use 8" drivers crossed over too high?
Are the JC80s
: better because one woofer is rolled off under ~200Hz?
:
:
: //Adam F
:
It must make you wonder how the same person can ramble on
for years about "The World's Best Speaker" (Quad ESL 63 -
just in case anyone forgot) and yet recommend stuff like
this?

Regards TT
Phil Allison
2004-10-13 06:02:30 UTC
Permalink
"TT"
Post by TT
It must make you wonder how the same person can ramble on
for years about "The World's Best Speaker" (Quad ESL 63 -
just in case anyone forgot) and yet recommend stuff like
this?
** More deliberate, malicious lies from TT.






............ Phil
TT
2004-10-13 12:41:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phil Allison
"TT"
Post by TT
It must make you wonder how the same person can ramble on
for years about "The World's Best Speaker" (Quad ESL 63 -
just in case anyone forgot) and yet recommend stuff like
this?
** More deliberate, malicious lies from TT.
............ Phil
Oh I forgot! You got your money back on the last lot. Mmmmmm.........?
Maybe not so perfect after all.

SS
Oat
2004-10-13 17:18:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by TT
It must make you wonder how the same person can ramble on
for years about "The World's Best Speaker" (Quad ESL 63 -
just in case anyone forgot) and yet recommend stuff like
this?
Phil uses a 2-way vifa.
TT
2004-10-14 00:17:26 UTC
Permalink
"Oat" <***@excite.com> wrote in message news:***@posting.google.com...
: > It must make you wonder how the same person can ramble
on
: > for years about "The World's Best Speaker" (Quad ESL
63 -
: > just in case anyone forgot) and yet recommend stuff like
: > this?
: >
:
: Phil uses a 2-way vifa.

Do Jaycar sell these to?

TT
roughplanet
2004-10-14 05:45:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by TT
: > It must make you wonder how the same person can ramble
: > on for years about "The World's Best Speaker" (Quad ESL 63 -
: > just in case anyone forgot) and yet recommend stuff like this?
: Phil uses a 2-way vifa.
Do Jaycar sell these to?
Yep. I'll bet pounds to peanuts PA's speakers are a Jaycar kit. Right Phil?

ruff
Phil Allison
2004-10-13 06:01:14 UTC
Permalink
"Adam F"
Post by Adam F
Post by Phil Allison
** Check out the Jaycar JC80
Actually I'm surprised you like them PA,
** You presume - I only suggested they be checked out.
Post by Adam F
wasn't one of your criticisms of the DC-Xes that they use 8" drivers
crossed over too high?
** What woofer x-over ?? - there was none.

Where is the point to your remark ??
Post by Adam F
Are the JC80s better because one woofer is rolled off under ~200Hz?
** Go fishing in the nearest lake - or jump if if you prefer.




.......... Phil
Phil Allison
2004-10-13 06:37:25 UTC
Permalink
"Belial"
Post by Belial
Post by Phil Allison
** Check out the Jaycar JC80
I've heard them in store and they didn't do a lot for me. Admittedly it
was far from a perfect, or even nice, listening environment. Might check
em out again - the price is definately right.
** Yep - the full kit sells for only $ 719 a *PAIR* at the moment.

See http://www1.jaycar.com.au/ and type "JC 80" into the search box.


The Parramatta store has them on demo - ring others to check.




............ Phil
TT
2004-10-13 12:38:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phil Allison
"Belial"
Post by Belial
Post by Phil Allison
** Check out the Jaycar JC80
I've heard them in store and they didn't do a lot for me. Admittedly it
was far from a perfect, or even nice, listening environment. Might check
em out again - the price is definately right.
** Yep - the full kit sells for only $ 719 a *PAIR* at the moment.
See http://www1.jaycar.com.au/ and type "JC 80" into the search box.
The Parramatta store has them on demo - ring others to check.
............ Phil
Phil Allison the Jaycar Stooge.

I hope Robby gets to read this after all the times you said this to him!

What a complete dead loss hypocrite you really are! Or are you a Saturday
morning bag stuffer for Jaycar now to try and help pay the rent?

SS
Phil Allison
2004-10-13 13:51:23 UTC
Permalink
"Belial"
Phil Allison
Post by Belial
Post by Phil Allison
** Check out the Jaycar JC80
I've heard them in store and they didn't do a lot for me. Admittedly it
was far from a perfect, or even nice, listening environment. Might check
em out again - the price is definately right.
** Yep - the full kit sells for only $ 719 a *PAIR* at the moment.

See http://www1.jaycar.com.au/ and type "JC 80" into the search box.


The Parramatta store has them on demo - ring others to check.



............ Phil
Phil Allison
2004-10-13 14:10:23 UTC
Permalink
"TT"

** The above notorious ME stooge, Equinox stooge, obsequious Phil Vaf
apologist, fawning admirer of aging pimps, raving nut cases and buddy to
Brother Paul does NOT want you to read this:


---------------------------------------------------------


Yep - the full Jaycar JC 80 speaker kit sells for only $ 719 a *PAIR*
at the moment.

See http://www1.jaycar.com.au/ and type "JC 80" into the search box.

The Parramatta store has them on demo - ring others to check.


---------------------------------------------------------


** What a crying shame that the usual box stuffers have no bargains like
this one to offer anyone.

That cheap DSE 80wpc integrated amp would go well with the JC80s.

Amp and decent speakers for well under $1000 !!!

Have some money left over for some nice room damping materials.





............ Phil
Galimatias
2004-10-13 23:11:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phil Allison
Yep - the full Jaycar JC 80 speaker kit sells for only $ 719 a
*PAIR* at the moment.
See http://www1.jaycar.com.au/ and type "JC 80" into the search box.
The Parramatta store has them on demo - ring others to check.
---------------------------------------------------------
** What a crying shame that the usual box stuffers have no bargains
like this one to offer anyone.
That cheap DSE 80wpc integrated amp would go well with the JC80s.
Amp and decent speakers for well under $1000 !!!
Have some money left over for some nice room damping materials.
Having a spam attack, Phil? Or do you get a commission to augment the
toaster repair income?
Robby
2004-10-14 02:22:41 UTC
Permalink
Galimatias,
I just love that reference to "toaster repair"
Robby
Galimatias
2004-10-14 02:32:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Robby
Galimatias,
I just love that reference to "toaster repair"
Robby
It's not funny! Those commissions treble Phil's income.
MDHJWH
2004-10-14 21:21:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Galimatias
Post by Robby
Galimatias,
I just love that reference to "toaster repair"
Robby
It's not funny! Those commissions treble Phil's income.
Look , I think all this nonsense about toasters is very unfair.I've
got a lovely 1950's pop-up toaster I'd love to get repaired but can't
find anyone with the necessary skills to do so. Maybe if I fly up to
Sydney with it and pop in on PA ............?

Ayn Marx J-Tone + S503
+ DD12
Galimatias
2004-10-14 23:09:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by MDHJWH
Post by Galimatias
Post by Robby
Galimatias,
I just love that reference to "toaster repair"
Robby
It's not funny! Those commissions treble Phil's income.
Look , I think all this nonsense about toasters is very unfair.I've
got a lovely 1950's pop-up toaster I'd love to get repaired but can't
find anyone with the necessary skills to do so. Maybe if I fly up to
Sydney with it and pop in on PA ............?
Absolutely. In gracious but vibrant Summer Hill. Might take a few weeks
for Phil to get the Manual, and work out which way to plug it in, of course.

Phil might also introduce you to his blow-up doll, called "Shazza" or
"Dazza", depending on how he feels at the time. Don't try anything. Phil
gets very jealous.
Robby
2004-10-15 00:39:37 UTC
Permalink
Be careful, very very careful!!!
MDHJWH
2004-10-15 06:53:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Galimatias
Post by Galimatias
Absolutely. In gracious but vibrant Summer Hill. Might take a few weeks
for Phil to get the Manual, and work out which way to plug it in, of course.
Phil might also introduce you to his blow-up doll, called "Shazza" or
"Dazza", depending on how he feels at the time. Don't try anything. Phil
gets very jealous.
Do stop casting aspersions on poor PA. He's utterly faithful to his
Harmon Kardon 'Soundsticks'.
I'm sure he'd never lower himself to (a) blow-up anything. Now can we
get back to the music and the junk that makes it?

Ayn Marx J-Tone + S503 +
DD12
t***@ausedition.com
2004-10-15 00:46:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by MDHJWH
Look , I think all this nonsense about toasters is very unfair.I've
got a lovely 1950's pop-up toaster I'd love to get repaired but can't
find anyone with the necessary skills to do so. Maybe if I fly up to
Sydney with it and pop in on PA ............?
Ayn Marx J-Tone + S503
+ DD12
Phil might use (I.M.O.) foul language in many of his posts...but at
least he's earn't his money honestly using his brains and not his
genitals.
Galimatias
2004-10-15 02:24:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by t***@ausedition.com
Phil might use (I.M.O.) foul language in many of his posts...but at
least he's earn't his money honestly using his brains and not his
genitals.
Each of us reaps what we sow.
MDHJWH
2004-10-15 06:49:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by t***@ausedition.com
Post by MDHJWH
Look , I think all this nonsense about toasters is very unfair.I've
got a lovely 1950's pop-up toaster I'd love to get repaired but can't
find anyone with the necessary skills to do so. Maybe if I fly up to
Sydney with it and pop in on PA ............?
Ayn Marx J-Tone + S503
+ DD12
Phil might use (I.M.O.) foul language in many of his posts...but at
least he's earn't his money honestly using his brains and not his
genitals.
Your thinking like a dick-head.
It's not possible to run 6 businesses without a brain pet, even if one
is selling twat by the hour.
Kissy Kissy

Ayn Marx J-Tone + S503 + DD12
t***@ausedition.com
2004-10-16 01:15:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by MDHJWH
Post by MDHJWH
Look , I think all this nonsense about toasters is very unfair.I've
got a lovely 1950's pop-up toaster I'd love to get repaired but can't
find anyone with the necessary skills to do so. Maybe if I fly up to
Sydney with it and pop in on PA ............?
Ayn Marx J-Tone + S503
+ DD12
Your thinking like a dick-head.
It's not possible to run 6 businesses without a brain pet, even if one
is selling twat by the hour.
Kissy Kissy
Ayn Marx J-Tone + S503 + DD12
The business in question requires no mental qualifications .
The business in question requires no degree or study.
The business in question is not complicated as it
is a business that sells only one product...
A Mr Whippe Van menu is more complicated.
A McDonalds menu is more complicated.
A box stuffers one capacitor crossover is more complicated.
A Petrol station(without the food and drinks section)
is more complicated.
No receipts given and all money paid in advance.
Easily managed by any Twat.
Galimatias
2004-10-16 01:52:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by t***@ausedition.com
Post by MDHJWH
Post by MDHJWH
Look , I think all this nonsense about toasters is very unfair.I've
got a lovely 1950's pop-up toaster I'd love to get repaired but
can't find anyone with the necessary skills to do so. Maybe if I
fly up to Sydney with it and pop in on PA ............?
Ayn Marx J-Tone + S503
+ DD12
Your thinking like a dick-head.
It's not possible to run 6 businesses without a brain pet, even if one
is selling twat by the hour.
Kissy Kissy
Ayn Marx J-Tone + S503 +
DD12
The business in question requires no mental qualifications .
The business in question requires no degree or study.
The business in question is not complicated as it
is a business that sells only one product...
A Mr Whippe Van menu is more complicated.
A McDonalds menu is more complicated.
A box stuffers one capacitor crossover is more complicated.
A Petrol station(without the food and drinks section)
is more complicated.
No receipts given and all money paid in advance.
Easily managed by any Twat.
That last excludes Phil.
MDHJWH
2004-10-16 08:07:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Galimatias
Post by t***@ausedition.com
Post by MDHJWH
Post by MDHJWH
Look , I think all this nonsense about toasters is very unfair.I've
got a lovely 1950's pop-up toaster I'd love to get repaired but
can't find anyone with the necessary skills to do so. Maybe if I
fly up to Sydney with it and pop in on PA ............?
Ayn Marx J-Tone + S503
+ DD12
Your thinking like a dick-head.
It's not possible to run 6 businesses without a brain pet, even if one
is selling twat by the hour.
Kissy Kissy
Ayn Marx J-Tone + S503 +
DD12
The business in question requires no mental qualifications .
The business in question requires no degree or study.
The business in question is not complicated as it
is a business that sells only one product...
A Mr Whippe Van menu is more complicated.
A McDonalds menu is more complicated.
A box stuffers one capacitor crossover is more complicated.
A Petrol station(without the food and drinks section)
is more complicated.
No receipts given and all money paid in advance.
Easily managed by any Twat.
That last excludes Phil.
You haven't the slightest idea of what you are talking about. Almost
half of all transactions in brothels involve no sex but run more along
the lines of discount psychotherapy. Few men are going to admit to
this so you can't be blamed for your ignorance.
Many transactions in brothels require the working girls to be skilled
at acting. (unless your only experience is of low class hookers who
simply just take your money & lie there looking bored.)
Now can we get back to audio?

Ayn Marx J-Tone + S503 +
DD12
Mr. T
2004-10-15 08:10:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by t***@ausedition.com
Phil might use (I.M.O.) foul language in many of his posts...but at
least he's earn't his money honestly using his brains and not his
genitals.
Everyone is entitled to use what they were born with. Brains, Brawn or
Beauty.
What makes you think one is more honest than the others?

Mr T.
TT
2004-10-15 09:04:49 UTC
Permalink
<***@ausedition.com> wrote in message news:***@4ax.com...
: On 14 Oct 2004 14:21:59 -0700, ***@iprimus.com.au
(MDHJWH) wrote:
:
:
: >
: >Look , I think all this nonsense about toasters is very
unfair.I've
: >got a lovely 1950's pop-up toaster I'd love to get
repaired but can't
: >find anyone with the necessary skills to do so. Maybe if
I fly up to
: >Sydney with it and pop in on PA ............?
: >
: >Ayn Marx J-Tone +
S503
: > + DD12
:
:
: Phil might use (I.M.O.) foul language in many of his
posts...but at
: least he's earn't his money honestly using his brains and
not his
: genitals.
:
The only problem with that statement is the location of his
brain *is* in his genitals. How else would he be so well
equipped to talk so eloquently out of his arse the whole
time!

This anally retentive, bipolar disordered, Richard cranium
cannot keep his potty mind above the navel for more than a
second and will *always* resort to his vileness as soon as
*any* discussion gets beyond his meagre capacity of limited
understanding.

I am sure I am not the only one here that believes that as
well.

Regards TT
Phil Allison
2004-10-15 09:51:25 UTC
Permalink
"TT"
Post by TT
I am sure I am not the only one here that believes that as
well.
** Terry - FYI anyone here with even half a brain can see that you have
no credibility whatever.

1. They know you are a blustering, puffed up, know nothing gearbox
mechanic.

2. They know you are a home theatre looney and hardly interested in 2 ch
hi-fi.

3. They know you are paranoid, irrational and unstable.

4. They also know you are obsessed with discrediting Phil Allison because
you cannot bear the fact he *knows* just what a nut case you are.





.............. Phil
paul packer
2004-10-15 10:20:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by TT
: Phil might use (I.M.O.) foul language in many of his
posts...but at
: least he's earn't his money honestly using his brains and
not his
: genitals.
The only problem with that statement is the location of his
brain *is* in his genitals. How else would he be so well
equipped to talk so eloquently out of his arse the whole
time!
This anally retentive, bipolar disordered, Richard cranium
cannot keep his potty mind above the navel for more than a
second and will *always* resort to his vileness as soon as
*any* discussion gets beyond his meagre capacity of limited
understanding.
I am sure I am not the only one here that believes that as
well.
Regards TT
Astonishingly accurate and beautifully rendered description. Have you
ever thought of taking up writing?
Phil Allison
2004-10-15 10:34:14 UTC
Permalink
"paul packer"
Post by paul packer
Astonishingly accurate and beautifully rendered description. Have you
ever thought of taking up writing?
** Brother Paul is a boring old pedagogue with a penchant for boy nudes.

He listens only to headphones in his tiny hostel room.

His dreams are of days gone by.

All of them wet.





.............. Phil
paul packer
2004-10-15 11:10:04 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 20:34:14 +1000, "Phil Allison"
Post by Phil Allison
"paul packer"
Post by paul packer
Astonishingly accurate and beautifully rendered description. Have you
ever thought of taking up writing?
** Brother Paul is a boring old pedagogue with a penchant for boy nudes.
He listens only to headphones in his tiny hostel room.
His dreams are of days gone by.
All of them wet.
I hope you're not speaking to me, Phil. I'm ignoring you, remember?

BTW, stop lurking on RAO. And stay off Google, there's a good boy.
Phil Allison
2004-10-15 11:29:35 UTC
Permalink
"paul packer
"Phil Allison"
Post by paul packer
Post by Phil Allison
Post by paul packer
Astonishingly accurate and beautifully rendered description. Have you
ever thought of taking up writing?
** Brother Paul is a boring old pedagogue with a penchant for boy nudes.
He listens only to headphones in his tiny hostel room.
His dreams are of days gone by.
All of them wet.
I hope you're not speaking to me, Phil. I'm ignoring you, remember?
** Yep - I can see that.
Post by paul packer
BTW, stop lurking on RAO. And stay off Google, there's a good boy.
** More of your geriatric wet dreams.





.............. Phil
TT
2004-10-15 11:51:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by paul packer
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 20:34:14 +1000, "Phil Allison"
Post by Phil Allison
"paul packer"
Post by paul packer
Astonishingly accurate and beautifully rendered description. Have you
ever thought of taking up writing?
** Brother Paul is a boring old pedagogue with a penchant for boy nudes.
He listens only to headphones in his tiny hostel room.
His dreams are of days gone by.
All of them wet.
I hope you're not speaking to me, Phil. I'm ignoring you, remember?
BTW, stop lurking on RAO. And stay off Google, there's a good boy.
Hi Paul, have you seen the pattern I warned you about emerging here yet?

Regards TT
paul packer
2004-10-15 13:52:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by TT
Post by paul packer
I hope you're not speaking to me, Phil. I'm ignoring you, remember?
BTW, stop lurking on RAO. And stay off Google, there's a good boy.
Hi Paul, have you seen the pattern I warned you about emerging here yet?
Regards TT
Mum's the word.
Oat
2004-10-15 03:14:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by MDHJWH
Look , I think all this nonsense about toasters is very unfair.I've
got a lovely 1950's pop-up toaster I'd love to get repaired but can't
find anyone with the necessary skills to do so. Maybe if I fly up to
Sydney with it and pop in on PA ............?
have you tried DBT on the toast? do you really think the 1950 toaster
will produce better toasts? Go to K-mart and grab a new one for $15.
TT
2004-10-15 12:00:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Oat
Post by MDHJWH
Look , I think all this nonsense about toasters is very unfair.I've
got a lovely 1950's pop-up toaster I'd love to get repaired but can't
find anyone with the necessary skills to do so. Maybe if I fly up to
Sydney with it and pop in on PA ............?
have you tried DBT on the toast? do you really think the 1950 toaster
will produce better toasts? Go to K-mart and grab a new one for $15.
Well, the early toasters, being analogue of course, gave a much better
response with more crispness, less colouration and a more mellow taste.
Where as the newer, digital toasters, are harsher, blander and miss that
certain refinedness that you can only truly get from analogue.

Now having said that if you were to invest in a Winkie Dinky Kink cable from
the land of the Long White Cloud you could improve the taste of your
digitised toast and taste a much better product. At only NZ$9,995 (A$1.99)
you could turn that nasty digital toaster into a refined SOTA (sort of tasty
appliance) device.

I hope this explains it well enough ;-)

Regards TT (severe leg pulling intended)
Eiron
2004-10-15 19:37:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by TT
Well, the early toasters, being analogue of course, gave a much better
response with more crispness, less colouration and a more mellow taste.
Where as the newer, digital toasters, are harsher, blander and miss that
certain refinedness that you can only truly get from analogue.
Now having said that if you were to invest in a Winkie Dinky Kink cable from
the land of the Long White Cloud you could improve the taste of your
digitised toast and taste a much better product. At only NZ$9,995 (A$1.99)
you could turn that nasty digital toaster into a refined SOTA (sort of tasty
appliance) device.
The most significant difference in toast is whether you prefer the
British restrained taste of Marmite or the Australian 'in-your-face'
style of Vegemite.

A double-blind test will often lead the consumer to think that they
are both 'on-your-face' so an extended test is often necessary.

Don't dismiss the Chinese. Their teas, though an acquired taste,
and perhaps lacking in 'slam', have a clarity seldom found elsewhere.
--
Eiron.
MDHJWH
2004-10-15 20:42:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Oat
Post by MDHJWH
Look , I think all this nonsense about toasters is very unfair.I've
got a lovely 1950's pop-up toaster I'd love to get repaired but can't
find anyone with the necessary skills to do so. Maybe if I fly up to
Sydney with it and pop in on PA ............?
have you tried DBT on the toast? do you really think the 1950 toaster
will produce better toasts? Go to K-mart and grab a new one for $15.
No, no . no. It's the look of the toaster that counts, not how the toast is cooked.
Were audiophools you know.
roughplanet
2004-10-16 03:06:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by MDHJWH
Post by Oat
Post by MDHJWH
Look , I think all this nonsense about toasters is very unfair.I've
got a lovely 1950's pop-up toaster I'd love to get repaired but can't
find anyone with the necessary skills to do so. Maybe if I fly up to
Sydney with it and pop in on PA ............?
have you tried DBT on the toast? do you really think the 1950 toaster
will produce better toasts? Go to K-mart and grab a new one for $15.
No, no . no. It's the look of the toaster that counts, not how the toast
is
cooked. Were audiophools you know.
Exactly (even if this is somewhat OT), which is why I have stuck with my
early 60's chrome retro-looking Sunbeam 'Radiant Control 'Toastermatic'.
Does it make good toast? Of course not, but neither have the dozen or so
others that I have owned at various times.
Considering (wo)mankind was able to put two people onto the surface of the
moon, it beggars belief that NOBODY has yet been able to design & build a
toaster that works properly, i.e. that will continue to produce variable
shades of toast (from light to burnt .... some folks DO like it that way)
for more than a couple of years. Most of the other toasters I've owned
slowly began to only toast half the slice; some toasted the top & not the
bottom of the slice, or vice versa, whilst others only toasted one side,
leaving the other side 'raw'. Eventually you get sick & tired of it, throw
the toaster into the rubbish bin (sometimes after unsuccessfully tinkering
with it's mechanism) & it's off to the local electrical store for a new one,
safe in the knowledge that it too will be a lemon after a period of time.
So if, as many people here seem to believe, PA is able to fix these blessed
things, rather than call him an idiot, you should be prostrating yourselves
before him with as much humility as you can manage. Anyone who can actually
fix a toaster is, in my opinion, a genius!

ruff
paul packer
2004-10-16 07:06:04 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 23:06:40 -0400, "roughplanet"
Post by roughplanet
Exactly (even if this is somewhat OT), which is why I have stuck with my
early 60's chrome retro-looking Sunbeam 'Radiant Control 'Toastermatic'.
Does it make good toast? Of course not, but neither have the dozen or so
others that I have owned at various times.
Considering (wo)mankind was able to put two people onto the surface of the
moon, it beggars belief that NOBODY has yet been able to design & build a
toaster that works properly, i.e. that will continue to produce variable
shades of toast (from light to burnt .... some folks DO like it that way)
for more than a couple of years. Most of the other toasters I've owned
slowly began to only toast half the slice; some toasted the top & not the
bottom of the slice, or vice versa, whilst others only toasted one side,
leaving the other side 'raw'. Eventually you get sick & tired of it, throw
the toaster into the rubbish bin (sometimes after unsuccessfully tinkering
with it's mechanism) & it's off to the local electrical store for a new one,
safe in the knowledge that it too will be a lemon after a period of time.
Good God, this is a miracle. And I thought I was just unlucky!
roughplanet
2004-10-17 02:25:19 UTC
Permalink
"paul packer" <***@iprimus.com.au> wrote in message news:***@news.iprimus.com.au...

On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 23:06:40 -0400, "roughplanet"
Post by paul packer
Post by roughplanet
Exactly (even if this is somewhat OT), which is why I have stuck with
my early 60's chrome retro-looking Sunbeam 'Radiant Control
'Toastermatic'.
Does it make good toast? Of course not, but neither have the dozen or
so others that I have owned at various times.
Considering (wo)mankind was able to put two people onto the surface
of the moon, it beggars belief that NOBODY has yet been able to
design & build a toaster that works properly, i.e. that will continue to
produce variable shades of toast (from light to burnt .... some folks DO
like it that way) for more than a couple of years. Most of the other
toasters I've owned slowly began to only toast half the slice; some
toasted the top & not the bottom of the slice, or vice versa, whilst
others only toasted one side, leaving the other side 'raw'. Eventually
you get sick & tired of it, throw the toaster into the rubbish bin
(sometimes after unsuccessfully tinkering with it's mechanism) & it's
off
to the local electrical store for a new one, safe in the knowledge that
it
too will be a lemon after a period of time.
Good God, this is a miracle. And I thought I was just unlucky!
Nah.... I could write a book about bloody toasters! I've probably had one of
every brand available, and NONE of them were worth more than $2.00.
Toasters are the ultimate rip-off. Nothing, including speaker cable, even
comes close. You can pay $10.00 or $200.00 & the result is identical; in
some cases the damn things never work properly at all, whilst in others, the
satisfactory period of operation could be as little as two months, or at
best, two years.
But they all go the same way in the end, assuming they haven't either broken
down completely (Sunbeam, Breville, Hecla, Morphy Richards, et al.) or
literally fallen apart (Sunbeam's 'luxury' model 4 slicer, DeLonghi &
another guy who also sells kettles, coffee makers etc. too).
I'd pay money to watch a toaster smashing contest; six BIG guys with 6 lb
sledge hammers and an unlimited supply of toasters. The guy who smashes the
most in 5 minutes wins $10,000. As the saying goes.... "I'd like to see
that!"

ruff
Phil Allison
2004-10-16 14:00:29 UTC
Permalink
"roughplanet"
Post by roughplanet
Nah.... I could write a book about bloody toasters! I've probably had one
of every brand available, and NONE of them were worth more than $2.00.
Toasters are the ultimate rip-off. Nothing, including speaker cable, even
comes close. You can pay $10.00 or $200.00 & the result is identical; in
some cases the damn things never work properly at all, whilst in others, the
satisfactory period of operation could be as little as two months, or at
best, two years.
But they all go the same way in the end, assuming they haven't either
broken down completely (Sunbeam, Breville, Hecla, Morphy Richards, et al.)
or
literally fallen apart (Sunbeam's 'luxury' model 4 slicer, DeLonghi &
another guy who also sells kettles, coffee makers etc. too).
I'd pay money to watch a toaster smashing contest; six BIG guys with 6 lb
sledge hammers and an unlimited supply of toasters. The guy who smashes
the most in 5 minutes wins $10,000. As the saying goes.... "I'd like to
see that!"
ruff
** ROTFLMAO !!!!

Dear Laurie - go get yourself a $20, Black & Decker "Classic" model
ET24 - AA (Chinese made ) from K-mart.

Two slice, 800 watt, electronic timer, chrome metal sides - looks neat,
cooks " perfect toast for ever " ;-)

Just like so *very* often with hi-fi - the more you pay the *less* you
get.




................ Phil
MDHJWH
2004-10-16 21:47:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by paul packer
"roughplanet"
Post by roughplanet
Nah.... I could write a book about bloody toasters! I've probably had one
of every brand available, and NONE of them were worth more than $2.00.
Toasters are the ultimate rip-off. Nothing, including speaker cable, even
comes close. You can pay $10.00 or $200.00 & the result is identical; in
some cases the damn things never work properly at all, whilst in others, the
satisfactory period of operation could be as little as two months, or at
best, two years.
But they all go the same way in the end, assuming they haven't either
broken down completely (Sunbeam, Breville, Hecla, Morphy Richards, et al.)
or
literally fallen apart (Sunbeam's 'luxury' model 4 slicer, DeLonghi &
another guy who also sells kettles, coffee makers etc. too).
I'd pay money to watch a toaster smashing contest; six BIG guys with 6 lb
sledge hammers and an unlimited supply of toasters. The guy who smashes
the most in 5 minutes wins $10,000. As the saying goes.... "I'd like to
see that!"
ruff
** ROTFLMAO !!!!
Dear Laurie - go get yourself a $20, Black & Decker "Classic" model
ET24 - AA (Chinese made ) from K-mart.
Two slice, 800 watt, electronic timer, chrome metal sides - looks neat,
cooks " perfect toast for ever " ;-)
Just like so *very* often with hi-fi - the more you pay the *less* you
get.
So Phil, you really are the toaster expert. Tee Hee .I'm off to buy a
B & D "Classic" .
If I have problems with it you know where it will end up: sideways
pet.

M & M A M A J
Galimatias
2004-10-16 23:00:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phil Allison
** ROTFLMAO !!!!
Dear Laurie - go get yourself a $20, Black & Decker "Classic"
model ET24 - AA (Chinese made ) from K-mart.
Two slice, 800 watt, electronic timer, chrome metal sides - looks
neat, cooks " perfect toast for ever " ;-)
Just like so *very* often with hi-fi - the more you pay the
*less* you get.
There you go. Straight from the horse's [ ]. <----- insert word(s) here
to win a prize - an evening's entertainment at Phil's place in Summer Hill,
with his famous well-cured road kill and vino commun, accompanied by
Shazza/Dazza on the piano accordion. A night to remember.

Robby
2004-10-14 02:20:10 UTC
Permalink
Robby is reading this!
PA 'accuses' me of being a VAF stooge. If by that he means I praise VAF
products then I will proudly 'admit' to being a "stooge".
I will praise any Aussie product that mixes it with the rest of the world,
particularly, as in VAFs case, they outclass others in their price range.
This being what I call "price for performance". Providing that we compare
like with like, 'apples with apples' if you like!
I freely admit to being an owner of VAF products, the Gen IV DC-Xs included,
and I admit to being biased but only within the confines of my "price for
performance" comparison.
I don't pretend to be an expert in this field and if, IF, PA is considered
an expert then I'm glad I'm not, however I do know what I like as far as
sound goes.
I don't pretend to be an expert on human nature however it seems fairly
obvious that PA is jealous of VAFs success as he constantly, almost with
maniacal zeal, puts the company down.........or is it just that he has
problems trying to match PV of VAF when it comes to knowledge in this field?
Robby
Galimatias
2004-10-14 02:26:38 UTC
Permalink
...PA ... is it just that he has problems
Get away! Do you reckon?
TT
2004-10-14 08:01:13 UTC
Permalink
"Robby" <***@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message news:unlbd.24847$***@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
: Robby is reading this!
: PA 'accuses' me of being a VAF stooge. If by that he means
I praise VAF
: products then I will proudly 'admit' to being a "stooge".
: I will praise any Aussie product that mixes it with the
rest of the world,
: particularly, as in VAFs case, they outclass others in
their price range.
: This being what I call "price for performance". Providing
that we compare
: like with like, 'apples with apples' if you like!
: I freely admit to being an owner of VAF products, the Gen
IV DC-Xs included,
: and I admit to being biased but only within the confines
of my "price for
: performance" comparison.
: I don't pretend to be an expert in this field and if, IF,
PA is considered
: an expert then I'm glad I'm not, however I do know what I
like as far as
: sound goes.
: I don't pretend to be an expert on human nature however it
seems fairly
: obvious that PA is jealous of VAFs success as he
constantly, almost with
: maniacal zeal, puts the company down.........or is it just
that he has
: problems trying to match PV of VAF when it comes to
knowledge in this field?
: Robby
:
I hope you didn't misinterpret what I meant by my post. I
was just pointing out that every time some one praises a
product they get a accused of this. It seams that you get
accused of it more than some by PA.

And yes you are dead right PA has a maniacal hatred of
anything from Vaf. But what else would you expect from this
consummate under-achiever and uni drop out. He hates
success.

Regards TT
Belial
2004-10-14 09:21:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by TT
Phil Allison the Jaycar Stooge.
I hope Robby gets to read this after all the times you said this to him!
What a complete dead loss hypocrite you really are! Or are you a Saturday
morning bag stuffer for Jaycar now to try and help pay the rent?
SS
I may be wrong (I'm sure Phil will correct me if I am) but I think the
difference is Phil's perception that the jaycar kits represent better
value for money than the VAF kits. IE he sees VAF as con-men trying to
push a below-par product, whereas the jaycar stuff is worth the
(relatively small) price.

Ben
Phil Allison
2004-10-14 09:40:18 UTC
Permalink
"Belial"
Post by Belial
I may be wrong (I'm sure Phil will correct me if I am) but I think the
difference is Phil's perception that the jaycar kits represent better
value for money than the VAF kits. IE he sees VAF as con-men trying to
push a below-par product, whereas the jaycar stuff is worth the
(relatively small) price.
** Well said, Ben.

The various 2 way, hi-fi speaker designs (using Vifa components) sold as
"kits" by Jaycar over the last 10 years have been very realistically priced
and surprisingly good performers. I am referring to the JV 20, 40 and 60.
Only those with the facilities to make their own cabinets could better the
deal offered by Jaycar.

The designs also lent themselves to easy modification and upgrades, all
well within the average hobbyist's capabilities.

Upgrading your own speakers on a Saturday arvo is one of the most satisfying
activities for the hi-fi fan who not afraid to get his (or her) hands dirty
!

Like the old Joyce Maine TV ad said, with Jaycar ".... you don't pay for
any fancy overheads... "



............ Phil
Galimatias
2004-10-14 10:20:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phil Allison
Upgrading your own speakers on a Saturday arvo is one of the most
satisfying activities for the hi-fi fan who not afraid to get his (or
her) hands dirty !
Like changing the oil in your HQ Kingswood, is it, Phil?
Kai Howells
2004-10-12 11:22:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Belial
If anyone else has any other suggetions on sub-$1k 'full range' speakers
that sound decent I'm very much interested. The DC-7s and the LSK's F6s
are all that I've found so far.
Have a look at (and a good listen to) some Mission m35 or m34
floorstanders. The RRP on the m35 is around $1600 a pair, but I was able
to get them down to $1100 without any problems - mind you, this was at
the Hi Fi Supermarket (ie, boxdroppers) not a "real" hifi store, where
the service and advice would be a lot better - however if the
supermarket stores have what you want, then you can save a packet.

I also had a listen to the LSK F6 and their Transmission Line speaker -
much preferred the F6 actually, and was looking into getting four of
them and the matching centre...

The Mission m35 is a 3-way speaker, with good bass - it's got three
full-size drivers, and a tweeter - two drivers handle the bass, one for
mids and the tweeter does what tweeters do best =)
Philip Vafiadis
2004-10-12 02:24:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Belial
SNIP<
You're right about the publishing by other manufacturers - I've found
it
pretty frustrating. theloudspeakerkit.com publish full range freq
response graphs, but they don't mention if it's smoothed. Usually
though, it's just the standard Xhz - Xkhz +/-3db.
I suspect the reason that most manufacturers don't go to the trouble to
publish or even resource good measurements is that they understand the wider
market does not value them. Statistics on sales volumes are clear, many
people purchase for reasons other than reproduction accuracy or technical
excellence...ie. Cute looks, craftsmanship, big bass, warm sound...the list
is endless...these choices however are just as valid as purchasing on
reproduction accuracy and technical excellence to the individuals making
such choices. My company, VAF, chooses to value reproduction accuracy and
technical excellence. Fortunately for VAF, a sufficient number of consumers
value these things to sustain a viable and healthy business.... and that's
why we go to so much trouble with measurements...not to mention 3 full time
R&D engineers (excluding myself) and a well resourced lab.....there is still
room for improvement though. My hope for the coming year is to have reliable
measurements on all our models published including their measurement
conditions, equipment and settings. (100s of man hours of work)
Post by Belial
As a slight aside, any news on when the next gen DC-7s will be
available? I've heard a couple of very positive comments from people who
have heard the 'work in progress', and the current model is the size I'm
looking for and (just) within my price range. I'll be down your way
visiting family some time this year and would love to drop by and check
them out.> Ben
The new G4 models are definitely being accepted very well...anecdotal
feedback from staff is that most who listen to them order them. Simon Wilde
finalised the design recently and we have been awaiting parts for the first
production run....which arrived a few days ago. We received a few hundred
drivers a few weeks ago and these have already been tested. First full
production units have also passed Quality Control with flying colours! We
will begin shipping next week although the first production run is
completely pre-sold. This always happens with new models and it usually
takes 3-6 months before we can calculate the most appropriate balance of
supply to demand.

Kind regards

Philip Vafiadis

Founder, VAF Research Pty Ltd

www.vaf.com.au
Adam F
2004-10-12 07:27:11 UTC
Permalink
clearly, you have no further use for the prototypes and will be wanting to
offload them to a loyal (not poor) customer - like me for instance

happy to pay nominal fee + shipping ;)


//adam f
Post by Philip Vafiadis
The new G4 models are definitely being accepted very well...anecdotal
feedback from staff is that most who listen to them order them. Simon
Wilde finalised the design recently and we have been awaiting parts for
the first production run....which arrived a few days ago. We received a
few hundred drivers a few weeks ago and these have already been tested.
First full production units have also passed Quality Control with flying
colours! We will begin shipping next week although the first production
run is completely pre-sold. This always happens with new models and it
usually takes 3-6 months before we can calculate the most appropriate
balance of supply to demand.
Kind regards
Philip Vafiadis
Founder, VAF Research Pty Ltd
www.vaf.com.au
Fred At Home
2004-10-14 20:02:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Belial
I just noticed that in the DC-X gen 4 PDF an 'unsmoothed' freq response
graph is shown (labelled as 30-25khz, although the graph itself looks to
only show 40-10khz...).
Other freq response graphs on the VAF site are 'sm 1/3 Oct'.
Firstly, what's the smoothing process, any why would you do it (apart from
the obvious marketing reasons)? What exactly does sm 1/3 oct mean?
Secondly - has the new DC-X set a standard? Can we expect unsmoothed VAF
graphs in the future?
I'm not trying to be a PITA here - I'm genuinely interested in comparing
the VAF range (probably the DC-7 gen4s) with various other speakers, and
looking at freq response is a nice way to start shortlisting, before I
start the long and painful auditioning phase.
Ben
Ben, please keep in mind that VAF are an enclosure designer and
manufacturer, not a speaker designer. VAF source their drivers elsewhere.
Andrew Reilly
2004-10-14 21:17:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Fred At Home
Ben, please keep in mind that VAF are an enclosure designer and
manufacturer, not a speaker designer. VAF source their drivers elsewhere.
Not this lame argument again! Of course VAF are speaker designers. They
design and build loudspeakers.

Would you argue that Apple are not computer (and mp3 player) designers and
manufacturers because they buy their processors from IBM, Motorola and
PortalPlayer? Of course not. 90% of the speaker manufacturers in the
world (just to invent a random statistic) buy their drivers from third
parties. That necessarily makes their end-products all below-par in some
sense?

In the world of dynamic speakers, drivers certainly do have various
qualities, but they all still operate basically the same way. Speaker
design *is* mostly about cabinet and crossover design.
--
Andrew
Phil Allison
2004-10-14 23:11:09 UTC
Permalink
"Andrew Reilly"
Post by Andrew Reilly
Post by Fred At Home
Ben, please keep in mind that VAF are an enclosure designer and
manufacturer, not a speaker designer. VAF source their drivers elsewhere.
Not this lame argument again! Of course VAF are speaker designers. They
design and build loudspeakers.
** The usual name for business that arrange for mass produced drivers to be
mounted in some stylish wooden cabinet and then market the result is "box
stuffers".

The bottom feeders in the "box stuffing" game sell their finished products
to the retail trade who then apply a house brand to them - so the very same
speaker may appear in different dealers premises under different names. The
bargain priced speakers sold out the back of "white vans" have a similar
pedigree.

The "box stuffer" may also elect to market their creations with their own
brand name attached and either sell them direct to the public or via a
network of dealers. Selling direct to the public is the easy way to go and
cuts out the middle man profit margin - but sales are never likely to
become large.
Post by Andrew Reilly
Would you argue that Apple are not computer (and mp3 player) designers and
manufacturers because they buy their processors from IBM, Motorola and
PortalPlayer?
** Completely false analogy.
Post by Andrew Reilly
90% of the speaker manufacturers in the
world (just to invent a random statistic) buy their drivers from third
parties. That necessarily makes their end-products all below-par in some
sense?
** You are blurring an important distinction. The ability to design and
manufacture the drivers for a particular speaker system is a major
dvantage - since it gives the designer full control over the finished
product.

If you depend on an outside company to supply drivers *of their design*
then you are at their mercy - at any time the driver maker can alter a
particular driver or stuff up its manufacture so the ones being supplied are
not consistent or reliable - or worst of all, simply delete it entirely
forcing a re-design of your product.
Post by Andrew Reilly
In the world of dynamic speakers, drivers certainly do have various
qualities, but they all still operate basically the same way.
** Huh ??
Post by Andrew Reilly
Speaker design *is* mostly about cabinet and crossover design.
** Box and x-over design are routine jobs - driver design and manufacture
is the at the heart of any dynamic speaker.





............ Phil
Galimatias
2004-10-14 23:24:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phil Allison
** The usual name for business that arrange for mass produced
drivers to be mounted in some stylish wooden cabinet and then market
the result is "box stuffers".
The technical term is "gigolo". I'll bet you knew that, but didn't want to
appear a show-off.
Andrew Reilly
2004-10-15 00:00:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phil Allison
Post by Andrew Reilly
Would you argue that Apple are not computer (and mp3 player) designers and
manufacturers because they buy their processors from IBM, Motorola and
PortalPlayer?
** Completely false analogy.
As are they all, but there are uses for analogies anyway. There are (or
have been in the past) computer designers who also designed their own
processors (whether or not they then fabricated them themselves or
subcontracted that job to a fabrication specialist). (MIPS, Sun,
DEC, HP, Pr1me, DataGeneral, for example.) Almost all of them have given
up, or are in the process of giving up, or gone out of business
altogether: beaten by the economies of scale and focused expertise of
specialist processor manufacturers. It's a business issue, primarily,
not an engineering one.
Post by Phil Allison
** You are blurring an important distinction. The ability to design
and manufacture the drivers for a particular speaker system is a major
dvantage - since it gives the designer full control over the finished
product.
If you depend on an outside company to supply drivers *of their design*
then you are at their mercy - at any time the driver maker can alter a
particular driver or stuff up its manufacture so the ones being supplied
are not consistent or reliable - or worst of all, simply delete it
entirely forcing a re-design of your product.
All of that is certainly true. But it's not an absolute. That control
comes at a cost. We've seen exactly the scenario that you describe,
recently, with the end-of-production of certain Audax drivers that were
used by a few local speaker manufacturers. It's certainly a risk. Maybe
it's a smaller risk than being unable to compete with Seas or Vifa or
Audax or whoever, in terms of delivered performance per unit cost, though.

I imagine that the relative arguments probably change quite a bit with the
size of the company itself.
Post by Phil Allison
Post by Andrew Reilly
In the world of dynamic speakers, drivers certainly do have various
qualities, but they all still operate basically the same way.
** Huh ??
A meaningless sentence thrown in as a distraction :-)
[But to try to salvage something from it: just what corners of the dynamic
loudspeaker driver performance envelope are left on the floor by the
existing specialist driver manufacturers? Are those performance points
competitive advantages for any particular speaker design? And even if
some particular gap in the performance spectrum turns out to be important
for a particular speaker design, how infeasible is it to commission one
of the major manufacturers to produce a variant batch to meet those
requirements? It seems to me that that is done quite frequently.]
Post by Phil Allison
Post by Andrew Reilly
Speaker design *is* mostly about cabinet and crossover design.
** Box and x-over design are routine jobs - driver design and
manufacture is the at the heart of any dynamic speaker.
Speaker design is deciding what sort of speaker to produce, and at what
price, and then solving all of the engineering and business problems
associated with producing and distributing it. (MBA types: replace
"speaker" with "X"...) Ultimately, that is going to involve
buying stuff from third parties, even if only copper and trees (or
whatever other materials your engineers tell you to make the pieces out of).

Cheers,
--
Andrew
Phil Allison
2004-10-15 00:21:57 UTC
Permalink
"Andrew Reilly"
Post by Andrew Reilly
Post by Phil Allison
Post by Andrew Reilly
Would you argue that Apple are not computer (and mp3 player) designers and
manufacturers because they buy their processors from IBM, Motorola and
PortalPlayer?
** Completely false analogy.
As are they all,
** A purveyor of false analogies WOULD say that.
Post by Andrew Reilly
but there are uses for analogies anyway.
** Not any of the false ones.
Post by Andrew Reilly
Post by Phil Allison
** You are blurring an important distinction. The ability to design
and manufacture the drivers for a particular speaker system is a major
advantage - since it gives the designer full control over the finished
product.
If you depend on an outside company to supply drivers *of their design*
then you are at their mercy - at any time the driver maker can alter a
particular driver or stuff up its manufacture so the ones being supplied
are not consistent or reliable - or worst of all, simply delete it
entirely forcing a re-design of your product.
All of that is certainly true. But it's not an absolute. That control
comes at a cost.
** Have you got a license to speak Gobbledegook???
Post by Andrew Reilly
Post by Phil Allison
Post by Andrew Reilly
In the world of dynamic speakers, drivers certainly do have various
qualities, but they all still operate basically the same way.
** Huh ??
A meaningless sentence thrown in as a distraction :-)
** I've seen no other sort from Andrew.


(snip rest of meandering, self indulgent drivel )






........... Phil
Pooh Bear
2004-10-15 00:35:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phil Allison
"Andrew Reilly"
Post by Andrew Reilly
Post by Fred At Home
Ben, please keep in mind that VAF are an enclosure designer and
manufacturer, not a speaker designer. VAF source their drivers elsewhere.
Not this lame argument again! Of course VAF are speaker designers. They
design and build loudspeakers.
** The usual name for business that arrange for mass produced drivers to be
mounted in some stylish wooden cabinet and then market the result is "box
stuffers".
The bottom feeders in the "box stuffing" game sell their finished products
to the retail trade who then apply a house brand to them - so the very same
speaker may appear in different dealers premises under different names. The
bargain priced speakers sold out the back of "white vans" have a similar
pedigree.
The "box stuffer" may also elect to market their creations with their own
brand name attached and either sell them direct to the public or via a
network of dealers. Selling direct to the public is the easy way to go and
cuts out the middle man profit margin - but sales are never likely to
become large.
Not that different really fron 'box shifters' in that case. Marginal interest in
the product. Big interest in maximising sales.
Post by Phil Allison
Post by Andrew Reilly
Would you argue that Apple are not computer (and mp3 player) designers and
manufacturers because they buy their processors from IBM, Motorola and
PortalPlayer?
** Completely false analogy.
Post by Andrew Reilly
90% of the speaker manufacturers in the
world (just to invent a random statistic) buy their drivers from third
parties. That necessarily makes their end-products all below-par in some
sense?
** You are blurring an important distinction. The ability to design and
manufacture the drivers for a particular speaker system is a major
dvantage - since it gives the designer full control over the finished
product.
If you depend on an outside company to supply drivers *of their design*
then you are at their mercy - at any time the driver maker can alter a
particular driver or stuff up its manufacture so the ones being supplied are
not consistent or reliable - or worst of all, simply delete it entirely
forcing a re-design of your product.
Post by Andrew Reilly
In the world of dynamic speakers, drivers certainly do have various
qualities, but they all still operate basically the same way.
** Huh ??
Post by Andrew Reilly
Speaker design *is* mostly about cabinet and crossover design.
** Box and x-over design are routine jobs - driver design and manufacture
is the at the heart of any dynamic speaker.
Taming the box is about avoiding resonances and unwanted radiation. This is
easily achieved by use of techniques like bracing and use of suitable materials.
Crossover design need not be a complex issue ( especially if active such as
bi/tri-amped ).

Making a good transducer is another matter entirely.


Graham
Patrick Turner
2004-10-15 16:02:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phil Allison
** You are blurring an important distinction. The ability to design and
manufacture the drivers for a particular speaker system is a major
dvantage - since it gives the designer full control over the finished
product.
But the capital investment to set up a driver making factory in Oz
is astronomic, and totally unviable.
Nobody could ever do any good at it.
The cost of production would be 400% more than buying from OS.

There is no need for total control over the finished *driver* product.
The Oz speaker maker takes into account all the characteristics of whatever
drivers he chooses,
and produces the overall loudspeaker he desires.
There are plenty of drivers to choose from.
Post by Phil Allison
If you depend on an outside company to supply drivers *of their design*
then you are at their mercy - at any time the driver maker can alter a
particular driver or stuff up its manufacture so the ones being supplied are
not consistent or reliable - or worst of all, simply delete it entirely
forcing a re-design of your product.
Being forced to re-design in a changing world of supply and demand
is normal for any business. he cannot expect the same driver to be available for

more than a few years.
he must be flexible, and if a driver becomes unavailable, he has the resources
to be flexible, and still give his customers rapturous spine tingling sound
quality.
Post by Phil Allison
Post by Andrew Reilly
In the world of dynamic speakers, drivers certainly do have various
qualities, but they all still operate basically the same way.
** Huh ??
Post by Andrew Reilly
Speaker design *is* mostly about cabinet and crossover design.
** Box and x-over design are routine jobs - driver design and manufacture
is the at the heart of any dynamic speaker.
On this I agree, but there is some very decent expertise demonstrated
by quite a few competing driver makers, and to excel beyond these levels
and make uniquely better product is a very hard ask, and
anyone in Oz who attempts it could easily go broke.

Patrick Turner.
Post by Phil Allison
............ Phil
Phil Allison
2004-10-16 00:55:15 UTC
Permalink
"Patrick Turner"
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Phil Allison
** You are blurring an important distinction. The ability to design and
manufacture the drivers for a particular speaker system is a major
advantage - since it gives the designer full control over the finished
product.
But the capital investment to set up a driver making factory in Oz
is astronomic, and totally unviable.
** WRONG !!!!

In the not to distant past there were several factories making thousands of
drivers in Australia. Magnavox, Rola/Plessey and MSP all making a wide
range of drivers including hi-fi woofers and tweeters.

Presently we have Etone in Sydney and Lorenz in Melbourne making Sound
Reinforcement speakers and hi-fi woofers - my 10 inch sub is an Etone.
Post by Patrick Turner
There is no need for total control over the finished *driver* product.
** There is no need to wear shoes.
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Phil Allison
If you depend on an outside company to supply drivers *of their design*
then you are at their mercy - at any time the driver maker can alter a
particular driver or stuff up its manufacture so the ones being supplied are
not consistent or reliable - or worst of all, simply delete it entirely
forcing a re-design of your product.
Being forced to re-design in a changing world of supply and demand
is normal for any business.
** Pat cannot see the wood for the trees.

He would never be another "box stuffer" now would he ???





................ Phil
Galimatias
2004-10-16 01:26:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phil Allison
He would never be another "box stuffer" now would he ???
What do you do with Shazza/Dazza, eh?
Patrick Turner
2004-10-16 02:05:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phil Allison
"Patrick Turner"
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Phil Allison
** You are blurring an important distinction. The ability to design and
manufacture the drivers for a particular speaker system is a major
advantage - since it gives the designer full control over the finished
product.
But the capital investment to set up a driver making factory in Oz
is astronomic, and totally unviable.
** WRONG !!!!
In the not to distant past there were several factories making thousands of
drivers in Australia. Magnavox, Rola/Plessey and MSP all making a wide
range of drivers including hi-fi woofers and tweeters.
Yes indeed there *WERE* such factories.
Why did they quit?

It wasn't viable.

If it was so wonderfully profitable, they'd have kept going, noe wouldn't they?
Post by Phil Allison
Presently we have Etone in Sydney and Lorenz in Melbourne making Sound
Reinforcement speakers and hi-fi woofers - my 10 inch sub is an Etone.
Ah yes, Etone.

There is a market for large expensive woofers,
Why its just a cone, magnet, basket, and you get maybe a couple of hundred $$
for your efforts, but I don't know a living soul who'd use an Etone
in his hi-fi system.
(When one considers the cost of professional drivers from JBL,
it don't surprise me that maybe someone in Oz would make a cheaper equivalent.)
I ain't saying what you use as a sub ain't good, perhaps thats the easiest type
of speaker
to get right, but I simply have never seen recently manufactured in Oz midranges
and tweeters which
could compare with all the north european brands, and which would be regarded
as state of the art industry standard, and fetch rave reviews in any the hi-fi
press.

I doubt VAF or Equinox are about to turn to Etone for their drivers.
Hell, that ought to be able to happen, but I doubt anyone is ready for it to
happen soon.
Australia used to have tube factories, and we even made transistors;
there was considerable electronic manufacturing.
But not any more. A Labour prime minister removed tariffs, and the support for
Oz electros, because there were more labour voters who
wanted access to cheap asian goods than there were workers worth protecting
in jobs.
The process of globalisation will be the final nail in the coffin of Oz
manufacturing
on any sort of scale.
Just wait when we sign a TA with bloomin china.
Post by Phil Allison
Post by Patrick Turner
There is no need for total control over the finished *driver* product.
** There is no need to wear shoes.
By your reasoning, makers of amplifiers in Oz should also make their own
transistors,
or vacuum tubes.
Post by Phil Allison
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Phil Allison
If you depend on an outside company to supply drivers *of their design*
then you are at their mercy - at any time the driver maker can alter a
particular driver or stuff up its manufacture so the ones being supplied are
not consistent or reliable - or worst of all, simply delete it entirely
forcing a re-design of your product.
Being forced to re-design in a changing world of supply and demand
is normal for any business.
** Pat cannot see the wood for the trees.
He would never be another "box stuffer" now would he ???
What are you then? do you ever get to stuff anything?

Its easy to describe Australian manufacturers negatively by
calling them box stuffers et all, but I raise my hat to them all.

Patrick Turner.
Post by Phil Allison
................ Phil
Phil Allison
2004-10-16 02:49:37 UTC
Permalink
"Patrick Turner"
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Phil Allison
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Phil Allison
** You are blurring an important distinction. The ability to design and
manufacture the drivers for a particular speaker system is a major
advantage - since it gives the designer full control over the finished
product.
But the capital investment to set up a driver making factory in Oz
is astronomic, and totally unviable.
** WRONG !!!!
In the not to distant past there were several factories making thousands of
drivers in Australia. Magnavox, Rola/Plessey and MSP all making a wide
range of drivers including hi-fi woofers and tweeters.
Yes indeed there *WERE* such factories.
Why did they quit?
** Not relevant to the point at issue - the factories were NOT massive
investments nor inherently totally unviable as IS REQUIRED for your idiot
assertion to be true. The local manufacture of domestic hi-fi simply stopped
so demand dried up.

No-where did I say that a speaker maker MUST own their own driver making
facility - some of the most famous like AR did not. But they do need to
be able to have high quality, custom drivers made to a tightly controlled
spec for as long as they are needed.

One and two person business cannot possibly afford to do this do this and
"box stuffers" are not even slightly interested.
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Phil Allison
Presently we have Etone in Sydney and Lorenz in Melbourne making Sound
Reinforcement speakers and hi-fi woofers - my 10 inch sub is an Etone.
There is a market for large expensive woofers,
Why its just a cone, magnet, basket, and you get maybe a couple of hundred $$
for your efforts, but I don't know a living soul who'd use an Etone
in his hi-fi system.
** Your problem whom you do not know - arsehole and very revealing of the
**real problem** with Aussie drivers.

**** Lack of snob value. ****
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Phil Allison
Post by Patrick Turner
There is no need for total control over the finished *driver* product.
** There is no need to wear shoes.
By your reasoning, makers of amplifiers in Oz should also make their own
transistors, or vacuum tubes.
** Nope - that is a piece of your bucket reasoning, not mine.
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Phil Allison
Post by Patrick Turner
Being forced to re-design in a changing world of supply and demand
is normal for any business.
** Pat cannot see the wood for the trees.
He would never be another "box stuffer" now would he ???
What are you then? do you ever get to stuff anything?
** I spend my time *unstuffing* all manner of audio gear.

Not pretending to be someone or something I am not.
Post by Patrick Turner
Its easy to describe Australian manufacturers negatively by
calling them box stuffers et all,
** When the cap fits they have to wear it. Putting all speaker makers in
the same class is totally wrong.

I think there are a dozen identifiable classes of speaker maker - box
stuffers being the lowest.
Post by Patrick Turner
but I raise my hat to them all.
** Including to all the shonks no doubt.



.............. Phil
TT
2004-10-16 04:07:03 UTC
Permalink
<snip usual Phil crap>
:
: ** When the cap fits they have to wear it. Putting all
speaker makers in
: the same class is totally wrong.
:
: I think there are a dozen identifiable classes of
speaker maker - box
: stuffers being the lowest.
:
:
: > but I raise my hat to them all.
:
:
: ** Including to all the shonks no doubt.
:
:
:
: .............. Phil
:
:
Careful Mr. Jaycar Stooge you are putting your Saturday
morning job on the line here. Or are you trying to tell us
that Jaycar are not box stuffers as well? In one instance
you praise Jaycar and now you're alluding to them being a
lowlife????

I think you had better explain your hypocritical and
inconsistent point here 'coz you're not making any sense at
all. Or is this just another Schizoid event?

SS (awaiting the usual diatribe and abuse)
Phil Allison
2004-10-16 04:54:15 UTC
Permalink
"TT" = usenet crim

(snip usual pack of malicious lie)
Post by TT
Or are you trying to tell us
that Jaycar are not box stuffers as well?
** Jaycar operate a national chain of retail electronics stores with basic
components and project kits available including some audio kits. They happen
to sell some speaker system kits too. They import a wide range of drivers
and sell them to the public. They formerly sold a range of Vifa drivers.
Post by TT
In one instance
you praise Jaycar and now you're alluding to them being a
lowlife????
** TT's fuckwit opinions - not mine.




............. Phil
Belial
2004-10-16 06:21:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by TT
Careful Mr. Jaycar Stooge you are putting your Saturday
morning job on the line here. Or are you trying to tell us
that Jaycar are not box stuffers as well? In one instance
you praise Jaycar and now you're alluding to them being a
lowlife????
I think you had better explain your hypocritical and
inconsistent point here 'coz you're not making any sense at
all. Or is this just another Schizoid event?
SS (awaiting the usual diatribe and abuse)
Well technically, as they sell kits, would the consumer be the box stuffer?

Same could be said for VAF of course.....

Ben
Patrick Turner
2004-10-16 05:08:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phil Allison
"Patrick Turner"
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Phil Allison
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Phil Allison
** You are blurring an important distinction. The ability to design and
manufacture the drivers for a particular speaker system is a major
advantage - since it gives the designer full control over the finished
product.
But the capital investment to set up a driver making factory in Oz
is astronomic, and totally unviable.
** WRONG !!!!
In the not to distant past there were several factories making thousands of
drivers in Australia. Magnavox, Rola/Plessey and MSP all making a wide
range of drivers including hi-fi woofers and tweeters.
Yes indeed there *WERE* such factories.
Why did they quit?
** Not relevant to the point at issue - the factories were NOT massive
investments nor inherently totally unviable as IS REQUIRED for your idiot
assertion to be true. The local manufacture of domestic hi-fi simply stopped
so demand dried up.
But what I ask is relevant.

I ask again, why did Oz speaker driver making vitually stop?

Profitable industries just don't "simply stop".

They usually stop becaue they are driven to being
unprofitable, by some of the issues I have raised,
tariffs, OS competition, etc.
Post by Phil Allison
No-where did I say that a speaker maker MUST own their own driver making
facility - some of the most famous like AR did not. But they do need to
be able to have high quality, custom drivers made to a tightly controlled
spec for as long as they are needed.
The supply of such high quality speakers is readily available from existing OS
makers,
many of whom do custom batches for makers.
Post by Phil Allison
One and two person business cannot possibly afford to do this do this and
"box stuffers" are not even slightly interested.
But as I said before, its impossible to completely control what a driver
maker does; when he's done his run of specials, what you see is what you get,
and the speaker has to be designed around the driver carefully,
to get a total good package.
This is easily achievable by a one or two person business.
I would say there is no need to ever get a customized run of speakers made;
there is more than enough to choose from amoungst the standard lines
of most well regarded names, SEAS, SCanspeak, Vifa, Peerless, et all.

Some makers like to promote themselves as superior to any other by being able to
say
they had SEAS make special drivers for them, but often its so a cabinet
can be made smaller, and cheaper, rather than to offer
full range audio...

Then some of these makers blather on and on about what splendid measurements
they do,
and that they are the only ones who do it right, and everyone else is a
nincompoop.

But hearing is believing, and unbiased controlled AB listening tests between
brands
is never done anywhere, without some dickhead wanting to own the results for
himself.

I vowed never to buy their products because of the BS factor.

So I naturally drifted towards making all my own speakers.

I also made all my own tables, chairs, and lounges for the house, which was a
small
tiny house when I bought it cheaply, and which I doubled in size with my
own hands, thus saving all the trouble of earning the extra 200,000 bucks, (
today's value ) for the higher
mortgage. I didn't like the way Jennings homes operated.
I started my life unafraid of hard work, knowing that being a builder would
save me rather a lot of money when I tried to settle down, and
I transferred the level of competence to hi-fi.
Post by Phil Allison
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Phil Allison
Presently we have Etone in Sydney and Lorenz in Melbourne making Sound
Reinforcement speakers and hi-fi woofers - my 10 inch sub is an Etone.
There is a market for large expensive woofers,
Why its just a cone, magnet, basket, and you get maybe a couple of hundred $$
for your efforts, but I don't know a living soul who'd use an Etone
in his hi-fi system.
** Your problem whom you do not know - arsehole and very revealing of the
**real problem** with Aussie drivers.
**** Lack of snob value. ****
Call it what you like, but decent speakers are luxury goods, and its one thing
to make a couple of pairs
of truly outstandingly competitive speakers of exceptional high quality,
and using 100 hours+ of labour, but promotion of such wonders takes years,
and won't be viable unless you start with crap and work up.
For myself, I couldn't bring myself to start with crap, and lie or bribe my way
to fame.

If Etone wanna tell us all that what they make is better and cheaper than the
rest,
then they better get on with it.
But to me their operation is invisible.
Anyone dealing with an Oz speaker maker would check to see if the product
measured at least as well as what they already knew was marketable.

But do let me know when you have started a driver making company in Oz,
and have gained the confident orders of the speaker builders of Oz.

Its more difficult then you think.
I did make some sample speakers and I included the info
at my website, but I have yet to sell more than 1 pair in 4 years.
It is extremely difficult to make fine speakers, and a profit, or even a wage.
Its so much easier to make optimised crap.
Post by Phil Allison
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Phil Allison
Post by Patrick Turner
There is no need for total control over the finished *driver* product.
** There is no need to wear shoes.
By your reasoning, makers of amplifiers in Oz should also make their own
transistors, or vacuum tubes.
** Nope - that is a piece of your bucket reasoning, not mine.
And furthermore, I don't intend to tell New Sensor how they ought to make the
tubes
to suit the amps I make. The management there is not concerned about very much
innovation, but revels in buying up old names, like Mullard, and Tung-Sol,
and getting the russians to churn out replicas so close, they are the real
thing,
which command a premium price.
meanwhile, the EH KT88 and EH6550 are the same electronically and structurally,
I know, I have measured them for Ra, Gm and U. Neither tube is lie the original
old tubes made from 1957.
Not to worry, the EH russian tubes are very good, imho, and sound
equal of better than NOS, most of the time.


I did try 2 years ago to coax the ppl at EI in Nato bombed Yugoslavia to make a
directly
heated octal based TRIODE with the same pin out as EL34, 6L6, etc,
except for no screen connection, so that the proposed 6PT1 could be plugged
into every set which used an octal pentode or beam tetrode, and I mentioned it
would be easy to do,
since a triode is dead easy to make, it need be no larger than KT90, and if the
new tube had low Ra,
and Pd = to a 300B, then it would suit most 30 watt pentode/terode circuits,
give
better sound, and be a real hit in the market place.

The reaction of my emails at EI were quite appalling.
They tried to say they already had such a prototype, the 400B,
in the R&D stage. The last emails to me read like the guy there was drunk
on the plum brandy.
Nothing eventuated.

Quite a few makers don't like being asked for specials.
Half the time I believe that so called innovative products would be seen as
a threat to the sacred cow status of what should otherwise be a lot cheaper,
such as 300B tubes.

Once having trained the market to be used to paying a certain price,
nobody is willing to undercut it, and make money
on volume sales.

The hi-end world is like the high fashion world, rather fickle, and silly....
Post by Phil Allison
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Phil Allison
Being forced to re-design in a changing world of supply and demand
Post by Patrick Turner
is normal for any business.
** Pat cannot see the wood for the trees.
He would never be another "box stuffer" now would he ???
What are you then? do you ever get to stuff anything?
** I spend my time *unstuffing* all manner of audio gear.
Not pretending to be someone or something I am not.
Fine. Your'e incapable of making new products then.
No shame in that.
I've been making things all my life, as well as "unstuffing" things.

I spend so much time unstuffing, that I don't get enough time to
do any stuffing, and sometimes I think I am just stuffing around.

Fortunately, I have had to tell folks wanting repairs or custom work done that I
won't be available until
February, when I get through the list I have.

Life has a high SQ......Stuffability Quotient.
Post by Phil Allison
Post by Patrick Turner
Its easy to describe Australian manufacturers negatively by
calling them box stuffers et all,
** When the cap fits they have to wear it. Putting all speaker makers in
the same class is totally wrong.
I think there are a dozen identifiable classes of speaker maker - box
stuffers being the lowest.
Post by Patrick Turner
but I raise my hat to them all.
** Including to all the shonks no doubt.
Where did I classify anyone as a shonk?

I see shonks, I avoid shonks, I cross the street when they approach me,
pulling the hat low o'er my brow, but never would I raise it to them.

But where I see the well made goods selling at dreamy prices,
I raise my hat with a cheer, since I see an opportunity
to emulate their capabilities, and afford a bowl of rice.

Patrick Turner.
Post by Phil Allison
.............. Phil
Phil Allison
2004-10-16 05:31:35 UTC
Permalink
"Patrick Turner"
Phil Allison
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Phil Allison
** Not relevant to the point at issue - the factories were NOT massive
investments nor inherently totally unviable as IS REQUIRED for your idiot
assertion to be true. The local manufacture of domestic hi-fi simply stopped
so demand dried up.
But what I ask is relevant.
** No it is not - it was another of your Turneroid red-herrings and wobbly
concertos for solo trumpet.
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Phil Allison
No-where did I say that a speaker maker MUST own their own driver making
facility - some of the most famous like AR did not. But they do need to
be able to have high quality, custom drivers made to a tightly controlled
spec for as long as they are needed.
The supply of such high quality speakers is readily available from existing OS
makers, many of whom do custom batches for makers.
** A "batch" is not a continuous supply.

Unless the speaker maker designs the driver he still gets what the factory
hacks decide to send him.
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Phil Allison
One and two person business cannot possibly afford to do this do this and
"box stuffers" are not even slightly interested.
But as I said before, its impossible to completely control what a driver
maker does;
** Bullshit and wrong.
Post by Patrick Turner
I would say there is no need to ever get a customized run of speakers made;
there is more than enough to choose from amoungst the standard lines
** Real speaker makers find that is untrue and does not address the
problems of production variations and product deletions.
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Phil Allison
** Your problem whom you do not know - arsehole and very revealing of the
**real problem** with Aussie drivers.
**** Lack of snob value. ****
Call it what you like,
** It is irrational by any name.
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Phil Allison
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Phil Allison
** Pat cannot see the wood for the trees.
He would never be another "box stuffer" now would he ???
What are you then? do you ever get to stuff anything?
** I spend my time *unstuffing* all manner of audio gear.
Not pretending to be someone or something I am not.
Fine. Your'e incapable of making new products then.
** That idiotic and malicious conclusion does not follow - note another
Turneroid red-herring.

As you *know* I have designed many electronic things, manufactured
quantities of some of them, had others manufacture quantities, had some of
them published in EA magazine and then sold a kits by DSE, Jaycar and
Altronics as kits.

Unlike pricks like you, I have no interest in making overpriced valve
anachronisms for the terminally deluded.




.............. Phil
Philip Vafiadis
2004-10-15 01:02:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Andrew Reilly
Post by Fred At Home
Ben, please keep in mind that VAF are an enclosure designer and
manufacturer, not a speaker designer. VAF source their drivers elsewhere.
Not this lame argument again! Of course VAF are speaker designers. They
design and build loudspeakers.
SNIP<> Andrew
Yes Andrew, but this is an oportunity for learning not frustration...the
question has been asked, and some will be interested in answers.

Industry publications like The Journal for the Society of Audio Engineers
(AES) http://www.aes.org/, Voice Coil Magazine
http://www.audioxpress.com/magsdirx/voxcoil/ will give deeper insight to how
this industry actually works to those who are interested....subscriptions
are not expensive and AES student discounts are available...from only
USD$20.

The premise of this sub-thread is like saying Lotus are not car designers
because they buy their engines, brakes, electrics, glass, tyres, wheels,
suspension, seats, instruments, lights from component
manufactures.....anyone who has had the pleasure of driving one knows Lotus
adds the lions share of what makes a Lotus a Lotus.

Now break the issue down even further and to bring it back to hi-fi. Krell,
Sonus Faber, Snell, Dunlavy, Energy, KEF, Krix, and every other Speaker
Manufacturer on the planet buy parts from subcontractor component suppliers.
The same contractors that supply parts for the Flagship models for each of
the brands above, also supply VAF. ..The same miss-informed observation that
began this sub-thread would result in the question, what is a driver
manufacturer but an assembler of parts? Aton, for instance
http://www.aton.co.th/index.php in Thailand supply some of the worlds best
voice coils and diaphragm assemblies to the same premium driver brands that
enthusiasts in this group fantasise over....The map on their customers page
does not take much imagination to fill in. How about Kurt Mullers roll
Surrounds? or even Peter Larsens freelance transducer design services used
by many European and Asian driver manufacturers?

We are all links in the chain, the artist (or even their song writers), the
recording engineers, the designers of their equipment, the recording process
itself etc etc etc right down to the end 'listener'. VAFs part in this
chain is to produce the best value, technically advanced and most accurate
speakers possible.

Kind regards
Philip Vafiadis
Founder, VAF Research Pty Ltd
www.vaf.com.au
MDHJWH
2004-10-15 09:11:06 UTC
Permalink
"Philip Vafiadis" <***@vaf.com.au> wrote in message news:<***@duster.adelaide.on.net>...
\>
Post by Philip Vafiadis
The premise of this sub-thread is like saying Lotus are not car designers
because they buy their engines, brakes, electrics, glass, tyres, wheels,
suspension, seats, instruments, lights from component
manufactures.....anyone who has had the pleasure of driving one knows Lotus
adds the lions share of what makes a Lotus a Lotus.
\
Yeh, like nasty cramps in the calf muscles from hidiously stiff clutches.
Phil Allison
2004-10-14 22:19:39 UTC
Permalink
"Fred At Home"
Post by Fred At Home
Ben, please keep in mind that VAF are an enclosure designer and
manufacturer, not a speaker designer.
** I understand that are not even that - the cabinets are made by
subcontractors.




............ Phil
Galimatias
2004-10-14 23:11:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phil Allison
** I understand that are not even that - the cabinets are made
by subcontractors.
Keyboard sticky, Phil?
Patrick Turner
2004-10-15 15:49:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phil Allison
"Fred At Home"
Post by Fred At Home
Ben, please keep in mind that VAF are an enclosure designer and
manufacturer, not a speaker designer.
** I understand that are not even that - the cabinets are made by
subcontractors.
............ Phil
Is the Pope a catholic?

He'd reckon he was.

From what I hear from Mr V himself, he and the other staff spend their
days designing and testing speakers.

I don't give an old boot even if the cabinets were made in Timbucktoo.
Same goes for the drivers.

Most good speaker manufacturers assess the technical aspects of a driver
they may choose, and then design the crossovers and cabinets to suit;
its impossible to build a box, and a crossover, and then design a driver to
suit them.

But any maker is stuck with the drivers as they are, or stuck
with modifying them, eg, glueing bits of foam on, or
perhaps specifying speaker drivers to be made in a certain way,
like Sonus Faber does, and Vienna Acoustic.
When a maker gets a batch of "specials" delivered he still has to verify
the driver is suitable, and design around it.

So if a maker chooses SEAS or Scanspeak, or Audax, whatever,
the majority of the sound quality is down to the driver maker imho,
providing the maker has done a reasonable job with the cabinets
and crossovers.

Most pairs speaker cabinets can be made in a couple of hours.

I have seen the way some kitchen joiners operate, and its
fast, fast, fast. Speakers made using the latest precision joinery
techniques
take very little effort obce the production line is set up.
A maker like VAF would mabe get $1,500 for a given pair of speakers,
but his drivers and cabinet may have a cost price of $500,
leaving $1,000 for all the other costs of running a business and some
profit.

Its all very well for someone to poke muck at manufacturers, but the
loudest
bad noise always comes from those who don't make anything,
and who don't rent/own business premises, and who don't employ
ppl at real wages, day after day, and who don't spend the time to
advertise and promote the product. They don't take much of a business risk.

Businesses have a habit of going bad, or having some unforseen catastrophe,

like a fire, or a divorce, or a legal claim, and so let's not get too
grumpy
about someone who manages to keep a business bank account in the black.
It ain't easy, I know.

I wouldn't for a minute suggest I agree with all
the spiel from Mr V about the speakers he makes, but I have listened to
DC-X and I-66 on several recent occasions,
and yes, Mr VAF *is* a loudspeaker maker, and one
who don't do too bad compared with some of the other
stuff I see and hear.


It would do all the other Oz makers a power of good to openly
discuss their product here at aus.hi-fi.
Cat got their tongue?
Are we stuck with only Mr V?
Are they frightened of their own BS?

Or do most business folk think that its such a rat's nest here
that they wouldn't be seen dead being pilloried to death by the mob?

Maybe they are too busy filling orders.

Patrick Turner.
Phil Allison
2004-10-16 01:00:56 UTC
Permalink
"Patrick Turner"
Post by Patrick Turner
It would do all the other Oz makers a power of good to openly
discuss their product here at aus.hi-fi.
Cat got their tongue?
Are we stuck with only Mr V?
Are they frightened of their own BS?
Or do most business folk think that its such a rat's nest here
that they wouldn't be seen dead being pilloried to death by the mob?
** Probably frightened off just like Equinox were when Phil Vaf let his
lawyer off the leash and threatened to sue for defamation.

Didn't you know that PV thinks he owns this NG ????

He has enough stooges posting here to tell you that.





............... Phil
Patrick Turner
2004-10-16 02:30:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phil Allison
"Patrick Turner"
Post by Patrick Turner
It would do all the other Oz makers a power of good to openly
discuss their product here at aus.hi-fi.
Cat got their tongue?
Are we stuck with only Mr V?
Are they frightened of their own BS?
Or do most business folk think that its such a rat's nest here
that they wouldn't be seen dead being pilloried to death by the mob?
** Probably frightened off just like Equinox were when Phil Vaf let his
lawyer off the leash and threatened to sue for defamation.
Didn't you know that PV thinks he owns this NG ????
He has enough stooges posting here to tell you that.
Yes, I realize Mr VAF is a bit like John Howard.
He's mean and tricky, ( as Peter Costello said of John, who didn't sue him
afterwards, )
and the arrogance Mr V displays at times is breathtaking, and does him no good

in the eyes of those with moderate intelligence and good ears.
He is a man who like to impress with facts and figures but he can never hope
to fully succeed, since hardly anyone here could agree what the facts are.
It appears to me folks buy Mr V's speakers despite his efforts here.
For myself, I have always seen better value by means of DIY than *anything* in
the shops
or elsewhere that I have ever listened to.
If I added up the time it took to get the speakers I have, its probably a
fortune,
but I don't care about the time I spent instead of watching TV.
I am a skilled joiner, with an adequate tool set, so DIY for me was always my
choice, and I doubt I will ever buy a new or sh speaker in my life.

Maybe Mr V's speakers sound better than the ones you make, eh.

But the issues raised by anyone here can be stood up to without
naming anyone, and nobody gets to own the NG.
That's how one gets around people prone to suing someone for
retarding their business profile.

And all the folks I know who have a brain and want a better deal
then the local hi-fi store or white van sale will check around all the Oz
makers,
and compare the bang for the buck value, and vote with their wallets
accordingly,
after a long tedious and nit picking examination.

So no matter what is said here on the group, I really doubt it
makes much difference to sales.
At the end of the day, its the perceived value that clinches a deal.


Patrick Turner.
Post by Phil Allison
............... Phil
Rick Stadelmaier
2004-10-16 05:58:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phil Allison
** Probably frightened off just like Equinox were when Phil Vaf let his
lawyer off the leash and threatened to sue for defamation.
Didn't you know that PV thinks he owns this NG ????
He has enough stooges posting here to tell you that.
Phil V didn't frighten us away, he simply showed us his true colours.

I don't post here much because I believe this is no place for commercial
interests to advertise.
It's a public forum, for the public to discuss hi-fi, not for manufactures and
dealers to discuss the products they make or sell.

I'll comment about my product if someone asks a specific question, however I'll
attempt to make it as brief as possible.

As for my business promotion, that's what my website is for.

Rick.
--
Rick Stadelmaier
Equinox Audio
http://www.equinoxaudio.com.au
***@SPAMTRAPequinoxaudio.com.au
(remove SPAMTRAP to reply via email)
Sydney, Australia
Loading...